In view of what is no doubt that anyone could be Prime Minister of Spain. The clarity of this statement, democratic generously, you owe it to José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero , or more specifically the arrival of the noble patrician at La Moncloa, from which anyone can be president, any chump, all illiterate, any uneducated, any pigeonpea, any upstart, any jurisdiction, any liar or useless. Anyone. Even I'm like any other that could have become president in honor of one of those qualities I have mentioned. Or because of all of them. For all but for not knowing Greek, because thanks to the tireless efforts of Don Antonio, nicknamed "iota" because of their small stature, I translate with some ease the Anabasis of Xenophon . Those were the days of old bachelor. Apparently, in this strange contest practicing PSOE merit access to the highest offices of the cast, not knowing what Greek enables one is to be Minister of Health. O Minister. Said the good called State Leire Pajin the Death with Dignity Act does not regulate euthanasia, but it relieves pain. As Okal. This girl is huge. If I had studied Greek or had used in class, it was said before, Leire Pajin know that the word euthanasia comes from the Greek words eu and and thanatos meaning death with dignity or death just good, so without missing an iota of truth semantics as the absolute truth we can say that it matters that as Death with Dignity Act Euthanasia Act.
But if that were not enough, I will give another test. In the absence of Euthanasia Bill has sent to Parliament the Government supporting the PSOE in precarious balance, I agree with the information you have posted one of its informal newsletters, the daily El Pais, which in its edition of 13 said last May that " Law [Death with Dignity] guarantees the rights to give medical treatment and the use of terminal sedation even at the expense of shortening the agony and hasten death." And green bags, because shortening the agony and hasten death by euthanasia, terminal sedation is .... To excite the user's personal social security does not read the fine print, who are many, the owner of the information shouted in large typefaces that " The Death with Dignity Act enshrines the right to die in a single room " which reminded me that futuristic, or at worst not so futuristic, entitled "Soylent Green " starring Charlton Heston , in which an old and tired of life Edward G. Robinson, choose euthanasia death that gives the state free of charge in a single room with widescreen video.
course paint us all with sweet colors: it is, you see, to alleviate the suffering of a person when he has no hope of recovery, after his free will and consciously expressed, of course, and with a favorable medical opinion, or two if they are small, they have to tell you, my dear taxpayers, it is the duty of the welfare state help to die with dignity and that man is master of his life. Final point and sedated.
With so much goodness gracious, I would say a Briton, it strikes me odd questions, more than anything tease:
What happens when the patient is not suffering from terminal capable freely and consciously express their will?
Who will supply? Does compassionate doctor? Does the relative who will inherit the sick? Does the regular judge? State?
How far is also a lapse of time between now meet the unspoken desire of terminally ill and will not meet tomorrow expressed in the terminally ill, the disabled psychic or mentally ill, which also suffer?
And between these substitutions and have overridden the will of the judge or the State against the will of decreased stuttering psychic?
Before you answer these questions I will remind them something I wrote recently in an article entitled "Life is Beautiful" were the laws of the State, state judges and state medical , who created and implemented the euthanasia program in Nazi Germany, the same who devised the slogan "Leben ohne Hoffnung " (Life Without Hope) to justify euthanasia.
No deaths unworthy, but laws unworthy.
.
.
